Why Advocate for Science? - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 12
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Erosion of Trust in Institutions
- Pew Research CenterReliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- Pew Research CenterReliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
Tension Between Objectivity and Advocacy
- PLOS ClimateReliability score: 87 | Accuracy score: 75
- PLOS ClimateReliability score: 87 | Accuracy score: 75
Defunding of Research & Suppression of Data
- Audubon MagazineReliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 75
- Audubon MagazineReliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 75
- NCAC (Government Accountability Project)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- NCAC (Government Accountability Project)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
Scientists Running for Public Office
- TIMEReliability score: 74 | Accuracy score: 82
- TIMEReliability score: 74 | Accuracy score: 82
- Science Advances / PMCReliability score: 89 | Accuracy score: 75
- Science Advances / PMCReliability score: 89 | Accuracy score: 75
Misinformation Spreads Faster Than Peer-Reviewed Science
- Science (AAAS)Reliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 75
- Science (AAAS)Reliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 75
