Election Science Denial - Topic Citations

Topic ID: 120

Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom. The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.

Full My-Epiphany Citation Wiki

Official Findings on Election Security

Independent Investigations Found Insufficient Evidence

Statistical Anomalies Do Not Establish Fraud

Bots Amplifying Election Narratives

Rejecting Established Findings

Erosion of Trust in Elections

Late-Count Shifts Have Ordinary Explanations

Audits as Independent Verification

Repetition Makes Claims Seem Credible

Unverified Data Embraced as Proof

Intimidation of Election Workers

Amplification by Influential Accounts and Networks