Public Advocacy in Science - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 21
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Local/Regional Government and Public Input in Planning
- Talking Climate archiveReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Talking Climate archiveReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
Primary Source - Talking Climate Newsletter
- Katharine Hayhoe (Substack)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 58
- Katharine Hayhoe (Substack)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 58
Local Engagement Case Study Referenced in Newsletter
- Katharine Hayhoe (Substack)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
- Katharine Hayhoe (Substack)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
Local Concerns Reducing Polarization/Psychological Distance ("Chris Chu" Study)
- ResearchGateTaking Climate Change Here and Now - Mitigating Ideological Polarization with Psychological DistanceReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- ResearchGateReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- Global Environmental Change (Elsevier/ScienceDirect)Reliability score: 87 | Accuracy score: 75
- Global Environmental Change (Elsevier/ScienceDirect)Reliability score: 87 | Accuracy score: 75
