Science - A Way of Thinking - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 24
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Scientific Literacy Decline & Threat to Democracy
- She Seeks NonfictionReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- She Seeks NonfictionReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- She Seeks NonfictionReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- She Seeks NonfictionReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Goodreads (verified book excerpts)Reliability score: 35 | Accuracy score: 75
- Goodreads (verified book excerpts)Reliability score: 35 | Accuracy score: 75
Nine-Tool Baloney Detection Kit - Verified Match
- Open CultureReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Open CultureReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- The Marginalian (Maria Popova)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- The Marginalian (Maria Popova)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
"Candle in the Dark" Metaphor & Science as a Way of Thinking
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
Primary Source Text
- Carl Sagan (1995)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Carl Sagan (1995)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Carl Sagan (1995)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Carl Sagan (1995)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
