History of Antiscience - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 28
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Stalin, Lysenkoism, and the Suppression of Genetics
- Cornell University Library (exhibition)Reliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 82
- Cornell University Library (exhibition)Reliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 82
- Encyclopedia.comReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- Encyclopedia.comReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
Rousseaus Discourse on the Arts and Sciences
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
Boyle vs. Hobbes - Early Modern Antiscience Debate
- Princeton University PressReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- Princeton University PressReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- H-Net ReviewsReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- H-Net ReviewsReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75