CFCs and Their Impact - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 33
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Ozone Depletion Chemistry (Chlorine Catalytic Chain Reaction)
- Chemistry LibreTextsReliability score: 76 | Accuracy score: 82
- Chemistry LibreTextsReliability score: 76 | Accuracy score: 82
Montreal Protocol as the Most Successful Environmental Treaty
- UN Environment Programme (UNEP)Reliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 82
- UN Environment Programme (UNEP)Reliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 82
- NASA Earth ObservatoryReliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 75
- NASA Earth ObservatoryReliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 75
CFC History & Early Industrial Use
- American Chemical SocietyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- American Chemical SocietyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
Discovery of Ozone Depletion & the Antarctic Ozone Hole
- American Chemical SocietyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- American Chemical SocietyReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
Ozone Layer Recovery (Measurable Progress)
- NOAAReliability score: 97 | Accuracy score: 82
- NOAAReliability score: 97 | Accuracy score: 82
Ozone Depletion Chemistry - Quantitative Figure
- NOAA (The Ozone Hole)Reliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 75
- NOAA (The Ozone Hole)Reliability score: 93 | Accuracy score: 75
Health & Ecosystem Impacts of Ozone Depletion
- Global Landscapes Forum (ThinkLandscape)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- Global Landscapes Forum (ThinkLandscape)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
