Funding Challenges in Science - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 4
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Grant Success Rates & Time Spent Writing Proposals
- Casadevall et al. (NCBI/PMC)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- Casadevall et al. (NCBI/PMC)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- Federal Demonstration Partnership (via biorxiv preprint)Reliability score: 70 | Accuracy score: 75
- Federal Demonstration Partnership (via biorxiv preprint)Reliability score: 70 | Accuracy score: 75
- STAT NewsReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- STAT NewsReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
Geographic & Institutional Funding Inequities
- Science AdvancesReliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 75
- Science AdvancesReliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 75
- Phys.org (reporting on Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment study)Reliability score: 77 | Accuracy score: 75
- Phys.org (reporting on Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment study)Reliability score: 77 | Accuracy score: 75
- Oxford Academic (Function journal)Reliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 75
- Oxford Academic (Function journal)Reliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 75
Grant Success Rates & Favoring Established Researchers
- PMCReliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMCReliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- arXiv (Snowmass '21 Community Engagement Frontier)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
- arXiv (Snowmass '21 Community Engagement Frontier)Reliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
Administrative & Compliance Burden
- COGR (Council on Governmental Relations)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- COGR (Council on Governmental Relations)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Association of American Universities (AAU)Reliability score: 80 | Accuracy score: 75
- Association of American Universities (AAU)Reliability score: 80 | Accuracy score: 75
Short-Term Funding Cycles & High-Risk Research
- NBER Working Paper SeriesReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- NBER Working Paper SeriesReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Nature Human BehaviourReliability score: 92 | Accuracy score: 75
- Nature Human BehaviourReliability score: 92 | Accuracy score: 75
- arXivReliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
- arXivReliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
Industry Funding & Commercial Influence
- arXivEthical Considerations and Statistical Analysis of Industry Involvement in Machine Learning ResearchReliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
- arXivReliability score: 72 | Accuracy score: 75
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (The Nutrition Source)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (The Nutrition Source)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMC (Scoping Review)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMC (Scoping Review)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
