Vaccine Evidence: A Foundation of Safety and Efficacy - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 40
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Brighton Collaborations Vaccine Safety Science
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 82
Post-Market Surveillance (CAEFISS & IMPACT)
- Government of CanadaReliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 82
- Government of CanadaReliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 82
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
Cochranes Independent, Unbiased Vaccine Reviews
- Wikipedia / CochraneReliability score: 58 | Accuracy score: 82
- Wikipedia / CochraneReliability score: 58 | Accuracy score: 82
Health Canada 10-Year Approval Timeline
- HealthLink BCReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
- HealthLink BCReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
- CBC NewsReliability score: 77 | Accuracy score: 75
- CBC NewsReliability score: 77 | Accuracy score: 75
FDA Vaccine Regulatory Role (U.S.)
- FDAReliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 82
- FDAReliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 82
