Improving Your Science Literacy - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 50
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Shifting Recommendations Looking Like Contradiction, Not Progress
- Cambridge Core (Public Health Nutrition)Reliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 75
- Cambridge Core (Public Health Nutrition)Reliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 75
- Golin Ketchum (reporting on NUTRITION 2026 conference)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 72
- Golin Ketchum (reporting on NUTRITION 2026 conference)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 72
Evaluating Sources & Credibility (Who Conducted It, How Was Data Gathered)
- House of Commons Library (UK)Reliability score: 90 | Accuracy score: 75
- House of Commons Library (UK)Reliability score: 90 | Accuracy score: 75
- Purdue GlobalReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Purdue GlobalReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
Science as Self-Correcting Process (Builds Trust, Not Doubt)
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 82
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 82
Intellectual Humility as a Foundation for Learning
- Greater Good Magazine (UC Berkeley)Reliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 75
- Greater Good Magazine (UC Berkeley)Reliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 75
