Undermining Science and Endangering Health - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 57
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
FDA Pressure on Drug Approval Based on Limited Evidence (Leucovorin/Autism) - Verified
- CNNReliability score: 73 | Accuracy score: 88
- CNNReliability score: 73 | Accuracy score: 88
- Genetic Literacy ProjectReliability score: 62 | Accuracy score: 75
- Genetic Literacy ProjectReliability score: 62 | Accuracy score: 75
NIH Clinical Trial Disruptions - 1 in 30, 74,000 Participants (Verified Exact Match)
- Scientific AmericanReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- Scientific AmericanReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- JAMA Internal Medicine (via CIDRAP)Reliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 97
- JAMA Internal Medicine (via CIDRAP)Reliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 97
NIH Scientist Resignation Over Censorship (Ultra-Processed Foods) - Verified & Named
- CBS NewsReliability score: 76 | Accuracy score: 82
- CBS NewsReliability score: 76 | Accuracy score: 82
- Washington PostReliability score: 78 | Accuracy score: 88
- Washington PostReliability score: 78 | Accuracy score: 88
