Climate Change - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 6
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Fossil Fuel Industry Internal Research vs. Public Denial
- Science (AAAS)Reliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 75
- Science (AAAS)Reliability score: 95 | Accuracy score: 75
- Scientific AmericanReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- Scientific AmericanReliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 75
- Britannica/The Conversation (Katharine Hayhoe)Reliability score: 78 | Accuracy score: 75
- Britannica/The Conversation (Katharine Hayhoe)Reliability score: 78 | Accuracy score: 75
90% of Skeptical Papers Linked to Think Tanks Claim - Verification
- Columbia Journalism ReviewReliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 75
- Columbia Journalism ReviewReliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 75
- CSSN (Almiron, citing Jacques, Dunlap & Freeman, 2008)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 58
- CSSN (Almiron, citing Jacques, Dunlap & Freeman, 2008)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 58
Conservative Think Tanks & Media Amplifying Skepticism
- Ars Technica (reporting on Robert Brulle, Climatic Change journal)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Ars Technica (reporting on Robert Brulle, Climatic Change journal)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Yale Environment ReviewReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Yale Environment ReviewReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
Political Suppression & Censorship of Climate Science
- WRAL NewsReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- WRAL NewsReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- Audubon MagazineReliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 82
- Audubon MagazineReliability score: 68 | Accuracy score: 82
- Climate Science Legal Defense FundReliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- Climate Science Legal Defense FundReliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
Forms/Typology of Climate Denial
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 75
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 82
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 82
- PLOS OneReliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 75
- PLOS OneReliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 75
Consequences: Denial Delaying Policy Response
- National Coalition Against Censorship (Government Accountability Project)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- National Coalition Against Censorship (Government Accountability Project)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
