Politics of Anti-Intellectualism - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 66
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Strategic Political Amplification of Anti-Expert Sentiment
- CEPR (Centre for Economic Policy Research)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- CEPR (Centre for Economic Policy Research)Reliability score: 63 | Accuracy score: 75
- Review of Democracy (Central European University)Reliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 82
- Review of Democracy (Central European University)Reliability score: 82 | Accuracy score: 82
Inequality & Exclusion Driving Distrust of Experts
- ScienceDirectReliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 82
- ScienceDirectReliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 82
- International Perspectives in Psychology (Hogrefe)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- International Perspectives in Psychology (Hogrefe)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
Political Impact on Public Policy (Science Education, Public Health)
- ScienceDirectReliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 82
- ScienceDirectReliability score: 85 | Accuracy score: 82
Digital Platforms & Belief-Based (vs. Evidence-Based) Communities
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75
- PMC (NIH)Reliability score: 88 | Accuracy score: 75