The Importance of Science Journalists - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 72
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Fostering Scientific Literacy & Critical Thinking
- Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society (via ERIC)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 72
- Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society (via ERIC)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 72
Maintaining Public Trust (Especially Amid Politicization)
- Journal of Science Communication (JCOM)Reliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 88
- Journal of Science Communication (JCOM)Reliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 88
Overall Bridging/Interpreting Role
- Journal of Science Communication (JCOM)Reliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 82
- Journal of Science Communication (JCOM)Reliability score: 83 | Accuracy score: 82
Watchdog Function - Scrutinizing Claims & Combating Misinformation
- EurekAlert! (reporting on a peer-reviewed study)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
- EurekAlert! (reporting on a peer-reviewed study)Reliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 82
