The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 73
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Hot Lots Theory (Corroborating Source)
- VaxopediaReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
- VaxopediaReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 75
VAERS Creation & Purpose (Independent Corroboration)
- Institute for Vaccine Safety (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)Reliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 82
- Institute for Vaccine Safety (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)Reliability score: 91 | Accuracy score: 82
VAERS Features Enabling Misuse (Open, Unverified, No Causation Determination)
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
Anti-Vaccine Misuse During COVID-19 (Custom Search Tools Stripping Disclaimers)
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
Hot Lots Theory & Why It is Flawed
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
Vaccine Safety Datalink & CISA as Rigorous Alternatives
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
- FactCheck.org (SciCheck)Reliability score: 86 | Accuracy score: 88
