Falsification and the Fight Against Science Denial - Topic Citations
Topic ID: 94
Every citation has two independent 0-100 scores. The source Reliability score rates the general reliability of the outlet itself, regardless of the specific claim, based on an eight-tier scale running from primary government and international scientific bodies (CDC, WHO, NASA, IPCC) at the top, through peer-reviewed journals, wire services, mainstream science journalism, and advocacy organizations, down to tertiary references like Wikipedia and unverifiable or absent sources at the bottom.
The Accuracy score, by contrast, rates how well a specific citation supports topic statements — a citation from an excellent source can score low if misapplied or can score high if it precisely backs up topic statements.
Popper Did Not Hold That a Single Anomaly/Failed Prediction Refutes an Entire Theory
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 88
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 88
Einsteins General Relativity Predicted a Precise Amount of Starlight Deflection by the Sun
- Royal Observatory GreenwichReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
- Royal Observatory GreenwichReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
Eddingtons 1919 Solar Eclipse Expedition Confirmed the Prediction
- Royal Observatory GreenwichReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
- Royal Observatory GreenwichReliability score: 65 | Accuracy score: 97
Karl Popper Proposed Falsifiability as the Demarcation Criterion for Science (1934)
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 97
- WikipediaReliability score: 55 | Accuracy score: 97
