Disclaimer
Please be aware that topic content has been generated by multiple AI systems and may contain errors, biases, inconsistencies, or outdated information. Content and related citations are both reviewed and validated. While we strive to deliver accurate and reliable content, it may not always reflect the latest developments or expert opinions. It is provided as-is without any representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the website content.
Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.
My-Epiphany has made every effort to mitigate AI content bias. Emerging research shows that conversational AI systems embed and sometimes amplify social, cultural and cognitive biases. Please refer to Cleaning the Chat: A User-Guide to Mitigating AI-Assistant Bias for an overview of the strategies that we've adopted when building and reviewing AI content.
The BBC/EBUBritish Broadcasting Corporation and the European Broadcasting Union. The EBU is the world's leading alliance of public service media (PSM). Established in 1950 and based in Geneva, Switzerland, it represents 112 member organizations across 56 countries. identifies four key components of reliable AI content:
- Accuracy: Is the AI content correct?
This includes the accuracy of statements but also of direct quotes. Key factual details and information, such as names, numbers, dates, locations, etc., should be accurate. Events and relations should be characterized correctly. Quotes, whether full or partial, should match exactly the words used in the cited source. The person quoted should be identified correctly. - Providing Context: Is the AI content providing all relevant and necessary information?
AI content should provide the relevant information and points of view that users need to understand the issue in question. AI content should also accurately convey the level of certainty that is warranted about a particular statement. - Distinguishing Fact From Opinion: Does the AI content clearly differentiate fact from opinion?
AI content should clearly distinguish between whether information is a statement of fact or of someone’s opinion or perspective. The latter should be clearly and accurately attributed. This includes being clear where the AI may be adding its own editorialization, views or judgement to the response, and to avoid any editorializing that could undermine the impartiality or trust of an organization cited elsewhere in the response as a source. - Sourcing: Is the AI content clear and accurate about where its information comes from?
Since AI responses involve no direct human editorial oversight, it is important that users are able to check and verify claims in AI content. The AI should always provide sources to support key claims in its response. The sources should be appropriate, relevant and accurately described. Any attributions of claims, statements or direct quotes within the body of the response should be accurate and accompanied by appropriate sourcing.
For more information please read the BBC/ECU News Integrity in AI Assistants and toolkit documents.
In no event will My-Epiphany liable for any loss or damage, including without limitation indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you may be able to link to other websites that are not under our control. We have no control over the nature, content, and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
We strongly recommend using this content as a starting point for further research and consultation with relevant subject matter experts or authorities. Adopt an open-minded yet skeptical attitude (i.e., challenge claims and demand evidence before acceptance). Employ critical thinking to objectively analyze and judge information.
Return
